<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Double Your Twitter Follower Conversion Rate: Cute Converts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://leadpress.com/twitter/conversion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://leadpress.com/twitter/conversion/</link>
	<description>LeadPress Mortgage Marketing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:01:25 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mortgage Marketing via Twitter?</title>
		<link>http://leadpress.com/twitter/conversion/#comment-3360</link>
		<dc:creator>Mortgage Marketing via Twitter?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2009 19:11:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leadpress.com/?p=4714#comment-3360</guid>
		<description>[...] Double Your Twitter Follower Conversion Rate: Cute Converts  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Double Your Twitter Follower Conversion Rate: Cute Converts  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trace Richardson</title>
		<link>http://leadpress.com/twitter/conversion/#comment-3329</link>
		<dc:creator>Trace Richardson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leadpress.com/?p=4714#comment-3329</guid>
		<description>Connie, thanks for weighing in....  you may consider it a no brainer, but most companies don&#039;t seem to judging by the use of their logo as logo use is a pretty traditional / intuitive thing to do... for better or worse....

Very few companies go the cute route... I&#039;m not convinced that a person&#039;s face and the authentic / personable element would win conversions over a &quot;cute&quot; element, but it would be interesting to test. I think &quot;cute&quot; might stand out more... but you never know. Again, this might be considered trivial, but I though the results were worth sharing as it is telling about the follow back decision making process... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Connie, thanks for weighing in&#8230;.  you may consider it a no brainer, but most companies don&#8217;t seem to judging by the use of their logo as logo use is a pretty traditional / intuitive thing to do&#8230; for better or worse&#8230;.</p>
<p>Very few companies go the cute route&#8230; I&#8217;m not convinced that a person&#8217;s face and the authentic / personable element would win conversions over a &#8220;cute&#8221; element, but it would be interesting to test. I think &#8220;cute&#8221; might stand out more&#8230; but you never know. Again, this might be considered trivial, but I though the results were worth sharing as it is telling about the follow back decision making process&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie R</title>
		<link>http://leadpress.com/twitter/conversion/#comment-3328</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://leadpress.com/?p=4714#comment-3328</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s pretty much a no brainer.  The logo is not personal at all and screams commercial. I bet you would have received even more followers if you used a real picture of yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s pretty much a no brainer.  The logo is not personal at all and screams commercial. I bet you would have received even more followers if you used a real picture of yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
